• info@ukrmova.iul-nasu.org.ua
  • +38 (044)-278-12-09
  • Print ISSN 1682-3540
  • e-ISSN 2707-5249
» Journal Issues » 2021 » Journal Ukrainian Language – № 2 (78) 2021 » Modern trends in the development of higher education terminology

Modern trends in the development of higher education terminology

Journal Ukrainian Language – № 2 (78) 2021
UDC 811.161.2’373.46:378
Іryna Shkitska, Doctor of Science in Philology, Professor in the Department of Information and Socio-Cultural Activities, West Ukrainian National University
11 Lvivska St., Ternopil 46020, Ukraine

Е-mail: i.shkitska@gmail.com
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0252-8111

Heading: Articles
Language: Ukrainian

Abstract: This article examines factors of the terminological system change in the Ukrainian educational
discourse. The innovations in higher education terminology are caused by strengthening of globalization processes and development of the newest information technologies, e.g., 1) emergence of new forms of education and educational activities; 2) changes in the accreditation procedure of educational programs; 3) increased attention toward issues of academic integrity and the quality of educational services; 4) importance of the practical component in educational activities; 5) fixation of neologisms in legislative documentation; 6) regulating of activities of higher educational institutions; 7) the desire of educational institutions to attract more applicants by updating names of educational programs, specialties, academic disciplines, and structural units; 8) positive coverage of educational institutions’ activities on social media and the Internet.

Increasing number of Anglicisms for concepts of educational activity is explained due to the dominance of English in world’s educational and scientific spheres. The author states a different degree of adoption of terms-anglicisms that function in educational discourse, which is reflected in their graphic and phonetic variance. Semantic analysis of borrowed terms (neologisms) considers variability in their structure and determines semantic groups of abbreviations based on terms of a relatively high frequency in modern educational discourse.

Keywords: term, terminoelement, globalization, internationalization of education, term-anglicism, in formation society.  

REFERENCES

1. Grinev-Grinevich, S.V. (2008) The Terminology Science. Training Book. Moscow: Akademia (іn Russian).
2. Kalinichenko, I.O. (2011). Conceptual terminology of inclusive education in Ukraine. Postmetodyka, 1, 12–17. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Postmetodyka_2011_1_4 (in Ukrainian).
3. Kozlova, N.A. (2008). Problems of using terminology in international educational tourism industry. Nauchno-Tekhnicheskie Vedomosti Sankt-Peterburgskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Ekonomicheskie Nauki, 4(61), 289–294. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/problemy-primeneniya-terminologii-v-industrii-mezhdunarodnogo-obrazovatelnogo-turizma (іn Russian).
4. Luk’’yanova, L.B., & Anishchenko, O.V. (2014). Adult Education: A Short Terminological Dictionary. Kyiv; Nizhyn (in Ukrainian).
5. Rusanivs’kyi V.M. (Ed.). (2010–2019). Dictionary of the Ukrainian Language (Vols. 1-10). https:// services.ulif.org.ua/expl/Entry/index? wordid=43931&page=1390 (in Ukrainian).
6. Sokolova, E.I. (2014). The term innovative educational cluster in a conceptual field of modern pedagogy. Nepreryvnoe Obrazovanie: 21 Vek: Nauchnyi Elektronnyi Zhurnal 2(6). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ termin-obrazovatelnyy-klaster-v-ponyatiynom-pole-sovremen-noy-pedagogiki (іn Russian).
7. Chernichkina, V.A., Glushkova, A.S. (2018). Specificity of modern terminology of educational tourism (problem statement). In I. Zhukovskaya (Ed.), Sovremennye Problemy i Perspektivy Razvitia Turizma i Sfery Uslug v Usloviakh Globalizatsii: Sbornik Statei I Vserossiiskoi Nauchno-Prakticheskoi Konferentsii (Vladimir, December 13–14, 2018), 351–355. Vladimir (іn Russian).
8. Shunevych, B. (2003). Substantiating of scientific terminology of distance learning. Visnyk Natsional’noho Universytetu “L’vivs’ka Politekhnika”. Problemy Ukrayins’koyi Termino lohiyi, 490, 95–104. http://ena. lp.edu.ua/bitstream/ntb/54717/2/2003n490_Shunevich_B-Obgruntuvannia_naukovoi_95-104.pdf (in Ukrainian).
9. Abimbola, I.O. (1988). The Problem of Terminology in the Study of Student Conceptions in Science. Science Education, 72(2), 175–184 (іn English).
10. Deniko, R.V., Shchitova, O.G. , Shchitova, D.A., Lan N.T. (2015). Learning Terminology in the Age of Higher Education Internationalization: Problems and Solutions. Procedia: Social and Beha vioral Sciences. 215, 107–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.582 (іn English).
11. Korucu, Agah Tugrul, Aikah, Ayse (2011). Differences between m-learning (mobile learning) and e-learning, basic terminology and usage of m-learning in education. Procedia: Social and Behavioral sciences. 15, 1925–1930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.029 (іn English).
12. Marshall, H. (2015). The global education terminology debate: Exploring some of the issues. The SAGE Handbook of Research in International Education. Second edition. Edited by M.Hayden, J. Levy, and J. Thompson. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC, 108–122 (іn English).
13. Taub, A., Allegrante, J.P., Barry, M.M., Sakagami, K. (2009). Perspectives on Terminology and Conceptual and Professional Issues in Health Education and Health Promotion Credentialing. Health Education&Behavior. 36(3), 439–450 (іn English).
14. Wandersee, J.H. (1988). The Terminology Problem in Biology Education: A Reconnaissance. The American Biology Teacher. 50(2), 97–100. https://doi.org/10.2307/4448654 (іn English).