{"id":7962,"date":"2019-12-15T20:05:17","date_gmt":"2019-12-15T18:05:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ukrmova.iul-nasu.org.ua\/?page_id=7962"},"modified":"2020-05-29T12:05:55","modified_gmt":"2020-05-29T09:05:55","slug":"osoblyvosti-movy-pershogo-ukrayinskogo-molytovnyka","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/ukrmova.iul-nasu.org.ua\/en\/https-ukrmova-iul-nasu-org-ua-https-ukrmova-iul-nasu-org-ua-vypusky-zhurnalu-html-html-html-html\/2017-2\/zhurnal-ukrayinska-mova-2-62-2017\/osoblyvosti-movy-pershogo-ukrayinskogo-molytovnyka.html","title":{"rendered":"LANGUAGE FEATURES OF THE FIRST UKRAINIAN PRAYER BOOK"},"content":{"rendered":"Natalia Puriaieva
\n<\/i><\/em>PhD in Philology, Senior Researcher of the Department of History of the Ukrainian Language and Onomastics, Institute of the Ukrainian Language of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
\n4 Hrushevskyi st., Kyiv 01001, Ukraine
\n\u0415-mail: puriajeva123@gmail.com<\/p>\n

Heading: <\/b><\/strong>Researches
\nLanguage: <\/b><\/strong>Ukrainian<\/p>\n

Abstract:<\/b><\/strong>\u00a0<\/b><\/strong>Analysis of the language of the I. Pului \u201cPrayer book for Russ people\u201d (Vienna, 1871) clearly demonstrates the intention of the translator to embody the concept of the new Ukrainian literary language that would organically combine its two regional versions – the Dnieper and Galician. That very approach was subsequently implemented in the translation of the Bible, on which I. Pului worked together with P. Kulish. We can assume that herewith I. Pului has directly followed the prescriptions of P. Kulish, or the translation has been edited by the writer. Thus, the language of \u201cThe prayer book\u201d combines the features of different Ukrainian dialects (north and eastern (prepositions and prefixes \u043e\u0434, \u0437\u043e-, \u043d\u0430\u0434\u043e-, \u0432\u0456\u0434\u043e-; soft group of adjectives: \u0432\u0456\u0447\u043d\u0456\u0439, \u0433\u0440\u0456\u0445\u043e\u0432\u043d\u0456\u0439; form of third person of pronouns with adverbs without opening \u043d (\u0434\u043e \u0456\u043e\u0433\u043e, \u0432 \u0456\u043e\u043c\u0443), south-eastern forms of nouns in Dative case with -\u043e\u0432\u0456, -\u0435\u0432\u0456 as opposed to western -\u043e\u0432\u0438, -\u0435\u0432\u0438); western features [\u0456] instead of [\u043e], [\u0435], [\u0438] (\u043f\u0456\u043c\u0441\u0442\u043e\u044e, \u0442\u0440\u0456\u0432\u043e\u0436\u0430\u0442\u044c, \u043a\u0440\u0456\u0432\u0430\u0432\u0438\u0445), \u043e\u0433\u043e\u043d\u044c and derivatives without prosthesis, comparatives with suffix -\u0456\u0449- without \u0439<\/b><\/strong>\u00a0(\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043d\u0456\u0449\u0443, \u0441\u043b\u0430\u0432\u043d\u0456\u0449\u0443), etc.<\/p>\n

The impact of P. Kulish is also noticeable in the use of linguistic techniques to create high style, suitable for liturgic and prayer texts. This was contributed by the consistent use of archaic, morphological and grammatical forms, vocabulary typical to Old Ukrainian language and partially preserved in some dialects. Thus, the distinctive feature of this translation is the consistent use of archaic forms: active participles of present and past time (\u0436\u0438\u0432\u043e\u0442\u0432\u043e\u0440\u044f\u0449\u0438\u0439, \u043f\u043b\u0430\u0447\u0443\u0449\u0438\u0439; \u0440\u043e\u0434\u0438\u0432\u0448\u0430, \u044f\u0432\u0438\u0432\u0448\u0438\u0439\u0441\u044f), passive past participle (\u043f\u0440\u0438\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0438\u043c\u0456, \u0441\u043b\u0430\u0432\u0438\u043c\u0438\u0439, \u043f\u043e\u043a\u043b\u043e\u043d\u044f\u0454\u043c\u0438\u0439); personal archaic form of the verb to be (\u0454\u0441\u0438, \u0454\u0441\u0442\u044c) and forms of perfect (\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044e\u0431\u0438\u0432 \u0454\u0441\u0438, \u043e\u0431\u0434\u0430\u0440\u0438\u0432 \u0454\u0441\u0438, \u044f\u0432\u0438\u0432 \u0454\u0441\u0438) archaic imperative forms of verb (\u0443\u043c\u043d\u043e\u0436\u0438, \u0438\u0441\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438, \u0443\u043c\u043e\u043b\u0438; \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0439\u0434\u0456\u0442\u0435, \u0445\u0432\u0430\u043b\u0456\u0442\u0435). Among the most expressive morphological and phonetic signs there are forms without phonetically expected sound-change of [o], [e] into [i] in the newly created closed syllables and unstressed open syllables (\u0431\u0456\u0441\u043e\u0432\u0441\u044c\u043a\u0430, \u0440\u0435\u043a, \u043d\u0435\u043c\u043e\u0447\u043d\u0438\u043c), formants -\u0435\u043d\u043d- (\u0433\u0440\u0456\u0445\u043e\u043f\u0430\u0434\u0435\u043d\u043d\u0454, \u0432\u043e\u0441\u043a\u0440\u0435\u0441\u0435\u043d\u043d\u0454), -\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c (\u043c\u0438\u043b\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c, \u043c\u0430\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044e, \u0431\u043b\u0430\u0433\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c, etc.).<\/p>\n

Keywords:<\/b><\/strong>\u00a0<\/b><\/strong>The first Prayer Book in Ukrainian, I. Pului.<\/p>\n

REFERENCES<\/h4>\n
    \n
  1. Horbach, O. (1988). Movostil of the newest translations of the Holy Scriptures into the Ukrainian language of the 19th \u2013 20th centuries. notes Ukr. Free Un-tu. <\/i><\/em>Part 13. Philosopher. Ft: Coll. The Linguistic Commission of the Scientific Congress in the 1000th Anniversary of the Baptism of Rus-Ukraine.<\/i><\/em>P. 29<\/i><\/em>\u00a0\u2013 98. <\/i><\/em>Munich (in Ukr.).<\/li>\n
  2. Hrytsenko, P.Yu. (1994). The main features of Podil’s speech. Podillya: historical and ethnographic study<\/i><\/em>. P. 74<\/i><\/em>\u2013 81<\/i><\/em>. Kyiv (in Ukr.).<\/li>\n
  3. Danylenko, A. (2011). The first translations of the New Testament in the Ukrainian language: Antony Kobyliansky vs. Panteleimon Kulish. In the force field of language. Inni Petrivni Chepizi<\/i><\/em>. P. 86<\/i><\/em>\u2013 101<\/i><\/em>. Kyiv (in Ukr.).<\/li>\n
  4. Datsenko, I. (2012). Ukrainian administrative language of Galicia and its terminology (1894 \u2013 1895). Vienna (in Ukr.). URL: http:\/\/othes.univie.ac.at\/22625\/1\/2012-09-05_0749159.pdf<\/li>\n
  5. Kumeda, O.P. (2011). P. Kulish’s Idiole Against the Background of the East Polish Dialect: Author. diss. … Cand. philol. Sciences: 10.02.01. 22<\/i><\/em> Kyiv (in\u00a0Ukr.).<\/li>\n
  6. Kumeda, O.P. (2010). P. Kulish’s linguistic views and the language of his works. National Science Magazine. teacher. to them. M.P. Drahomanov<\/i><\/em>. Series 10: Problems of grammar and lexicology of the Ukrainian language<\/i><\/em>. Vol. 6. P.\u00a027<\/i><\/em>\u2013 31<\/i><\/em>. Kyiv (in Ukr.).<\/li>\n
  7. Lesiuk, M. (2013). Psalter’s language translated by I. Puliui against the background of modern Ukrainian literary language. Romano-Slavic Discourse: A Collection of Sciences. wash.<\/i><\/em> 678. P. 65<\/i><\/em>\u2013 70<\/i><\/em>. Chernivtsi (in Ukr.).<\/li>\n
  8. Letter without envelope what is the answer Kryloshanin Malinovsky on the abstract of the prayer book. (1871). By Ivan Puliui. Vienna (in Ukr.).<\/li>\n
  9. The Belarusian-German Dictionary: in 2 vol. (1886). Eds. Yevhenii Zhelehivskyi and Sofron Nedilskyi. Vol. I \u2013 II. Lviv (in Ukr.).<\/li>\n
  10. Moser, M. (2008). Causes to the History of the Ukrainian Language. Kharkiv (in Ukr.).<\/li>\n
  11. Moroz, T. (2012). Common features of Ukrainian translations of the Bible in 1903 and the language of the works of Ivan Frank: high-style vocabulary. Studies in lexicology and grammar of the Ukrainian language, <\/i><\/em>12, 95<\/i><\/em>\u2013 103<\/i><\/em>\u00a0(in\u00a0Ukr.).<\/li>\n
  12. Nimchuk, V.V. (2000). Ivan Puliui is the first translator of prayers in modern Ukrainian. The Bible and Culture: Coll. of sciences. Articles<\/i><\/em>, 1, 174<\/i><\/em>\u2013 178<\/i><\/em>. Chernivtsi (in Ukr.).<\/li>\n
  13. Puliui, I. (1997). The Prayer Book. Psalter. Ed. V. Shenderovskyi. Kyiv (in\u00a0Ukr.).<\/li>\n
  14. Holy Service of God Our Father John Chrysostom in Ukrainian. (1922). Professor Ivan Ohienko translated into Ukr. from Greek. Part I. Text. Lviv (in Ukr.).<\/li>\n
  15. Syniavskyi, O. (1931). Elements of Shevchenko’s language, their origin and meaning. Culture of the Ukrainian word<\/i><\/em>, 1, 7<\/i><\/em>\u2013 51<\/i><\/em>\u00a0(in Ukr.).<\/li>\n
  16. Tymoshenko, P.D. (2013). Studios over the language of Taras Shevchenko. P.\u00a0199<\/i><\/em>\u2013 126<\/i><\/em>. Kyiv (in Ukr.).<\/li>\n
  17. Litwi\u0119ta Liturgia \u015awi\u0119tego Jana Zlotoustego. (1936). Warszawa (in Ukr.).<\/li>\n<\/ol>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Natalia Puriaieva PhD in Philology, Senior Researcher of the Department of History of the Ukrainian Language and Onomastics, Institute of the Ukrainian Language of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 4 Hrushevskyi st., Kyiv 01001, Ukraine \u0415-mail: puriajeva123@gmail.com Heading: Researches Language: Ukrainian Abstract:\u00a0Analysis of the language of the I. Pului \u201cPrayer book for Russ people\u201d […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":6677,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"page-doi.php","meta":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ukrmova.iul-nasu.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/7962"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ukrmova.iul-nasu.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ukrmova.iul-nasu.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ukrmova.iul-nasu.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ukrmova.iul-nasu.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7962"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/ukrmova.iul-nasu.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/7962\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8628,"href":"https:\/\/ukrmova.iul-nasu.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/7962\/revisions\/8628"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ukrmova.iul-nasu.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/6677"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ukrmova.iul-nasu.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7962"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}