• info@ukrmova.iul-nasu.org.ua
  • +38 (044)-278-12-09
  • Print ISSN 1682-3540
  • e-ISSN 2707-5249
» Journal Issues » 2017 » Journal Ukrainian Language №2 (62) 2017 » EXPRESSION OF THE CATEGORY OF DIMINUTIVITY


Journal Ukrainian Language №2 (62) 2017
UDC 811.161.2’373.43

Nina Klymenko
Corresponding Member of the NAS of Ukraine, Professor, Dr. Sci. (Philol.), Head of the Department of Lexicology, Lexicography and Structural-Mathematical Linguistics, Institute of the Ukrainian Language of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
4 Hrushevskyi St., Kyiv 01001, Ukraine

Heading: Researches
Language: Ukrainian

Abstract: The second part of the article is dedicated to the analysis of semantic transformations of words, which encompass suffixes, formal markers of diminutive-hypocoristic meanings. Some of them have features of diminutivity: приквітничок, чашолистики. Others have undergone metaphoric shift: стрілка, човник. Some of them attesting decrease of size, generalize the meaning of formative word and add to it specialized components. A great number of biological terms indicate desemantisation of diminutives and transfer of their meanings.

Keywords: diminutivity, diminutive desemantisation, semantic word-formation, family of words, composite formation, family of nominations, term formation, specialization of meanings.


  • SUBT – Dictionary of Ukrainian Biological Terminology. (2012). Kyiv (in Ukr.).
  • CUM-11 – Dictionary of the Ukrainian Language: in 11 vol. (1970 – 1980). Kyiv (in Ukr.).
  • DNGL – Babiniotis, G. (2005). Dictionary of the New Greek Language: Aeneas: Lexicology Center (in Greek).


    1. Bondarko, A.V. (1990). Functional grammar theory. Temporality. Modality. Leningrad (in Rus.).
    2. Horbach, F.H. (1954). The main means of expressing decrepitude in French: an abstract. diss. … Cand. philol. Sciences: 10.02.05. 14 Kiev (in Rus.).
    3. Dombrovskyi, R.O. (1989). Semantics and performance of the -ellu- denominative suffix in Late Latin. Foreign Philology. 95. Questions of classical philology, 21, 7 – 12. Lviv (in Ukr.).
    4. N.F. (2015). Deminitive category in Eastern Slavic and Modern Greek additives. Deminitives in Slavic Languages: Form and Role.P. 170 – 183. Maribor – Budapest – Kansas – Prague (in Ukr.).
    5. Mathesius, V. (2003). On the potentiality of linguistic phenomena. Selected works on linguistics.Moscow (in Rus.).
    6. Rodnina, L.O. (1979). The suffixal word formation of nouns in modern Ukrainian. Dictionary of Contemporary Ukrainian Literary Language. P. 57 – 117. Kyiv (in Ukr.).
    7. Ruda, N.V. (2015). Deminitive Desemantization: Causes and Functions (in Ukrainian, Latin and English). Linguistic and conceptual pictures of the world. 55. Part 2. P. 257 – 261. Kyiv (in Ukr.).
    8. Symonenko, L.V. (1991). Formation of Ukrainian biological terminology. Kyiv (in Ukr.).
    9. Stateeva, V.I. (1982). Deminivization in Ukrainian: abstract. diss. … Cand. philol. Sciences: 10.02.02. 19 Uzhhorod (in Ukr.).
    10. Tomizhina, G.Ya. (1974). Leveling down the diminutiveness of nouns formed by subjective assessment suffixes. Abstracts and reports of the Inter-University Scientific Conference on East Slavic Word Formation. P. 97. Kyiv (in Rus.).