Communicative-discourse studies in the modern Ukrainian Linguistic: trends and prospects

Natalya Konratenko
Doctor of Philology, Prof., Odesa National University by Mechnykov
2 Dvoryanskaya St., Odessa 65082, Ukraine
E-mail: kondr_nat@ukr.net

Heading: Researches
Language: Ukrainian

Abstract: The article is devoted to the research of the communicative-discursive scientific approach of the analysis of the lingual phenomena in Ukrainian linguistics. The main stages of the emergence and development of communicatively oriented currents in Ukrainian studies were traced, periodization and typology of the main problems of studying human discursive activity were proposed. The significant role of Ukrainian linguistics in the formation of European discourse and communicative linguistics is proved. An overview of the main scientific schools of communicative-discursive research is presented and the problems raised in the works of Ukrainian linguists are highlighted.

The purpose of the study is to prove the primacy of communicative pragmatic intelligence in Ukrainian linguistics, in contrast to the traditional study of their imitative nature. For a long time, primacy belonged to European and Russian linguists as pioneers in communicative and linguistic and pragmatic approaches to the study of linguistic phenomena, whereas it was Ukrainian scholarly schools that historically formed the newest foundation for the study of text and discourse. However, the formation of communicative-discursive research began in Ukrainian linguistics in the late 60’s of the 20 century, that is, in parallel with the development of linguopragmatics and discourse in foreign linguistics. This fact destroys the “complex of scientific inferiority”, which has long been supported by vocations and compulsory citations by foreign scientists, in particular Russian ones. Communicative-pragmatic inventions in Ukrainian studies originate from the work of O.O. Potebnia, V.M. Rusanivsky, I.K. Bilodid, I.I. Kovalyk, based on linguistic and theoretical texts developed in the national linguistics on the basis of the material of the Ukrainian language. Parallel formation of communicative-pragmatic researches in German studies should be considered not as a separate scientific direction, but, along with other linguistic intelligence, in particular in the domain of Slavic languages, which makes it possible to create a comprehensive theory of communicative-discursive research in Ukraine.

Keywords: discourse, textlinguistics, linguistic pragmatics, scientific school, communicative-discursive approach, Ukrainian linguistics.

REFERENCES

1. Harutyunova, N.D. (1990). Discourse. Linguistic Encyclopedic Dictionary. Moscow, pp. 136 – 137. (In Russ.)
2. Batsevich, F.S., Kochan, I.M. (2016). Linguistics of the text. Lviv, 316 pp. (In Ukr.)
3. Batsevich, F.S. (2005). Linguistic Genology: Problems and Prospects. Lviv, 264 p. (In Ukr.)
4. Batsevich, F.S. (2004). Basics of communicative linguistics: [textbook]. Kyiv, 344 p. (In Ukr.)
5. Bibik, S.P. (2010). Concentration in Ukrainian artistic prose: monograph. Kyiv – Luhansk, 288 p. (In Ukr.)
6. Shevchenko, I.S. (2005). Discourse as a Cognitive-Communicative Phenomenon: monograph. Kharkiv, 356 с. (In Ukr.)
7. Yermolenko, S.Ya. (1982). Syntax and stylistic semantics. Kyiv, 210 с. (In Ukr.)
8. Zagnitko, A.P. (2008). Fundamentals of discourse. Donetsk, 194 p. (In Ukr.)
9. Kovalik, I.I., Matsko L.I., Plyushch M.Ya. (1984). Method of conducting linguistic analysis of the text. Kyiv. (In Ukr.)
10. Kochan, I.M. (2008). Linguistic analysis of the text: teach. manual. Kyiv, 423 p. (In Ukr.)
11. Kukharenko, V.A. (1988). Interpretation of the text. Moscow, 192 p. (In Russ.)
12. Kukharenko, V.A. (2004). Interpretation of the text. Vinnitsa, 272 p. (In Ukr.)
13. Loseva, L.M. (1980). How the text is constructed. Moscow, 94 p. (In Russ.)
14. Loseva, L.M. (1968).Interfacial connection in monologue speeches: diss. … doc. filol Sciences: in 2 hours: 10.02.01. Odessa. (In Ukr.)
15. Potebnja, A.A. (1989).Thought and language. Word and myth. Moscow, pp. 17 – 200. (In Russ.)
16. Radzievskaya, T. (1998). Text as a means of communication. Kyiv, 191 p. (In Ukr.)
17. Rizun, V.V., Mamaliga, A.I., Feller, A.I. (1998). Essays on the text: theoretical issues of communication and text. Kyiv, 336 p. (In Ukr.)
18. Rusanivsky, V.М. Aesthetics of artistic word. URL: http://kulturamovy.univ.kiev.ua/KM/pdfs/Magazine11-1.pdf
19. Selivanova, E.A. (2002). Fundamentals of linguistic theory of text and communication. Kyiv, 336 p. (In Ukr.)
20. Serazhim, K.S. (2002). Discourse as a sociolinguistic phenomenon: methodology, architectonics, variability: monograph. Kyiv, 392 p. (In Ukr.)
21. Slinko, I.I., Guivanyuk, N.V., Kobylians’ka, M.F. (1994). Syntax of Modern Ukrainian Language: Problem Issues: Teach. manual. Kyiv, 670 p. (In Ukr.)
22. Sokolovska, S.V. History of the formation of linguistic pragmatics in foreign and domestic science. Studia philologica. Aug. 1. P. 101 – 107. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/stfil_2012_1_21
23. Feller, M.D., Rizun, V.V., Feller, A.I. (1998). Text as a model of communicative act. Essays on the text. Kyiv, pp. 223 – 334. (In Ukr.)
24. Shabat-Savka, S.T. (2014). Category of communicative intention in the Ukrainian language. Chernivtsi, 412 p. (In Ukr.)