• info@ukrmova.iul-nasu.org.ua
  • +38 (044)-278-12-09
  • Print ISSN 1682-3540
  • e-ISSN 2707-5249
» Journal Issues » 2018 » Journal Ukrainian Language №1 (65) 2018 » Terminological Variation at Its Present Stage of Development: Theoretical and Practical Aspects

Terminological Variation at Its Present Stage of Development: Theoretical and Practical Aspects

Journal Ukrainian Language №1 (65) 2018
UDC 811.161.2’373.46:62

Lesya Malevych
Ph.D., Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Ukrainian Studies,
National University of Water and Environmental Engineering
11 Soborna St., Rivne, Ukraine 33028
E-mail: lesya.malevych@gmail.com

Heading: Researches
Language: Ukrainian

Abstract: The article is discussing the problem of variation in the field of terminology. The purpose of the article is to describe modern theoretical and practical approaches to the phenomena of variation in terminology, to analyze the functions and causes of the terminological variation, to develop a classification of modern term variants.

The Ukrainian terminology of the water management served as the basis for the analysis, the choice of which is due to two main reasons: first, it is one of the oldest terminologies, the units of which are recorded in the most ancient literary works of the Ukrainian language; and second, it is one of the largest Ukrainian terminological systems that covers a whole range of natural, technical, and social sciences and is actively developing today.

The theory of terminological variation was proposed in the 60’s and the early 70’s of the 20th century. By the end of the 80’s, terminology was dominated by the prescriptive approach, according to which the use of variants in the terminology shows its imperfection, complicates the language of science, and therefore needs to be streamlined and standardized.

In the 90’s and the beginning of the 21th century, in addition to the prescriptive approach, a descriptive analysis acquires a significant distribution, the essence of which is to understand the variation as a completely natural property of the terminological systems, which enables their constant development. A descriptive approach in terminology was initiated and developed by adherents of the new terminological theories: socioterminology, communicative theory of terminology, functional, sociocognitive terminology, and frame-based terminology.

The article highlights the main reasons for the emergence of the terminological variation: 1) the need of nominating new objects and phenomena; an attempt to come up with a successful name creates multiple terms with the same meaning; 2) the process of renaming certain outdated or imperfect concepts leads to using them together with new ones for some time; 3) borrowing foreign terms; 4) the parallel naming of objects that already have a name in the Ukrainian language: verbose terms are replaced by shorter variants, abbreviations, symbols, etc.

In today’s Ukrainian water management discourse, we found about 550 variable paradigms, 72,8% of which are binomial, while the rest (27,2%) are multinomial, and include three or more terms.

The article offers the classification of modern term variants according to the following nomination criteria: 1) the specificity of the sign nature of the term; 2) the source of the specific naming (native terms, borrowed terms); 3) the number of languages involved in the nomination process; 4) derivation method; 5) nominative tools used to construct term variants.

Keywords: term, terminology, terminological variation, term variants, term variant classification.

REFERENCES

  1. Averbuk, K.Ya. (1986). Terminological variation: terminological and applied aspects. Questions of linguistics. Extract 6. S. 28 – 49. (In Russ.)
  2. Vasecka, O.I. (2015). Metadata for describing the variability of the terms of the Ukrainian language. System and structure of the East Slavic languages. Issue 8. P. 70 – 79. (In Ukr.)
  3. Vereshchak, Y.M. (2008). Variability of the phonemic structure of the word in the normative aspect (based on the material of British vocalism). Proceedings. Series: Philological Sciences (Linguistics). Kirovograd, P. 154 – 157. (In Ukr.)
  4. Gak, V.G. (1971). Asymmetry of the linguistic sign and some general terminology problems. Semiotic problems of languages of science, technology and computer science. Moscow, Ch. I. S. 68 – 71. (In Russ.)
  5. Golubovsky, I.O., Zhalay, V.Ya., Linyk, T. G., Bykhovets, N.M., Parkhomenko, A.F., Rubashova, L. M., Kruglikova, O.V., Rakhmanova, I.I., Boboshko, T.M. (2016). Terminological variability: approaches to studying. Linguistics of the XXI century. С. 3 – 22. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/ UJRN / linds_2016_2016_3
  6. Gorbachevich, K.S. (1978). Variance of the word and language norm. Leningrad, 238 p. (In Russ.)
  7. Grinev-Grinevich, S.V. (2008). Terminology. Moscow, 304 p. (In Russ.)
  8. Gritsenko, P.Yu. (1990). Areal variation of vocabulary. Kyiv, 272 p. (In Ukr.)
  9. Gureeva, A.M., Mislanova, S.L. (2010). Modeling of terminology (on the example of the term “international undergraduate”). Herald of the Voronezh State. un-that Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication. № 1. S. 91 – 93. (In Ukr.)
  10. Kots, T. (2016). The phenomenon of variability in the history of literary language. Ukrainian language. No. 2. S. 82 – 91. (In Ukr.)
  11. Leykich, V.M. (2012). Terminology: subject, methods, structure. Moscow, 5th ed. 261 s. (In Russ.)
  12. Lotte, D.S. (1961). Fundamentals of the construction of scientific and technical. Moscow, 158 p. (In Russ.)
  13. Malevich, L.D. (2010). Linguistic and extra-language deterministic processes of terminological borrowing. Proceedings. Series Philological. Ostrog, Vip. 14, pp. 411 – 415. (In Ukr.)
  14. Malevich, L.D. (2012). Theoretical fundamentals of terminology research. Proceedings. Series Philological. Ostrog, Extract. 31, pp. 61 – 63. (In Ukr.)
  15. Malevich, L.D. (1999). Features of the terminology of the pre-scientific period (on the material of hydro-ameliorative terminology). Linguistics. № 4 – 5, S. 51 – 58. (In Ukr.)
  16. Matvias, I. (1998). Variants of the Ukrainian literary language. Kyiv, 162 p. (In Ukr.)
  17. Popovich, R.G., Vakulenko, O.L. (2004). Terminological variability in the nominative aspect. Bulletin of Zhytomyr State University named after Ivan Franko. No. 17. p. 215 – 217. (In Ukr.)
  18. Prystay, B.P. (1992). Accentual variant of nouns of the female genus with suffix-from (a). Linguistics. № 6, S. 30 – 34. (In Ukr.)
  19. Radchenko, O.I. (2000). Language norm and variability in the Ukrainian scientific terminology: diss. … Candidate filol Sciences: 10.02.01. Kharkiv, 203 p. (In Ukr.)
  20. Rusanovsky, V.M. (1981). The notion of semantic and stylistic invariant. Linguistics. Num. 3, S. 9 – 20. (In Ukr.)
  21. Simonenko, L.O. (1991). Formation of Ukrainian Biological Terminology. Kyiv, 152 p. (In Ukr.)
  22. Struganets, L. (2011). Differential signs of the norm of the literary language. Culture of the word. Vp. 74, P. 34 – 43. (In Ukr.)
  23. Taranenko, O.O. (2000). Options. Ukrainian language. Encyclopedia. Kiev, P. 59 – 60. (In Ukr.)
  24. Tkach, A.V. (2009). Slavic variability: the identity of Ukrainian medical terminology: author’s abstract. dis … Candidate filol Sciences: 10.02.01. Kyiv, 20p. (In Ukr.)
  25. Tsaralunga, I.B. (2012). The phenomenon of variability in the context of linguistic studies. Actual problems of philology and translation studies. Aug. 5, P. 205 – 216. (In Ukr.)
  26. Languages of the World: Problems of Linguistic Variation: Sat. Articles. (1990). Moscow, 214 p. (In Russ.)
  27. Bauer, L. (2002). An Introduction to International Varieties of English. Edinburgh, 135 p.
  28. Budin, G.A. (2001). Critical Evaluation of the State of the Art of Terminology Theory. Terminology Science and Research. Vol. 12. No. 1 – 2, P. 7 – 23.
  29. Cabré, M.T. (1998). Terminology: Theory, Methods and Applications. Amsterdam – Philadelphia, 248 p.
  30. Chulo, O., Nitzke, J. (2016). Patterns of the Terminological Variation in Post-editing and Cognate Use in Machine Translation in Contrast to Human Translation. Baltic Journal of Modern Computing. Vol. 4. P. 106 – 114.
  31. Drouin, P., Francoeur, A., Humbley, J., Picton, A. (2017). Multiple Perspectives on Terminological Variation. Amsterdam – New York, 260 p.
  32. Faber, B.P. (2009). The Cognitive Shift in Terminology and Specialized Translation. MonTI. Monograph de Traducción e Interpretación. No. 1. R. 107 – 134.
  33. Faber, P., Montero, S., Castro, M., Senso, J., Prieto, J., León, P., Márquez, C., Vega, M. (2006). Process-oriented Terminology Management in the Domain of Coastal Engineering. Terminology. Vol. 12 (2), P. 189 – 213.
  34. Fernández-Silva, S., Freixa, J., Cabré, T. (2012). Cognitive Approach to Synonymy in Translation. Cognitive Linguistics between Universality and Variation. Ed. by M. Brdar, I. Raffaelli, F. M Zic. Cambridge, P. 189 – 213.
  35. Gaudin, F. (2003). Socioterminologie, une approche sociolinguistique de la terminologie. Bruxelles, 286 p.
  36. Kerremans, K. (2014). Terminological Variation in Multilingual Europe: The Case of English. Environmental Terminology Translated into Dutch and French. URL: https: // prezi. com / zgzig … / terminological-variation-in-multilingual-europe
  37. Maslies, R. (2016). Terminology at the European Parliament and the European Institutions. Scientific Terminology of the New Age: Theoretical and Applied Dimensions: Materials of the International Scientific Conference (Rivne, September 15 – 16 of September, 2016). Rivne, 455 p. URL: http://ep3.nuwm.edu.ua/4821/
  38. Picht, H., Draskau, J. (1985). Terminology: An Introduction. Guildford, 265 p.
  39. Nenadič, G., Ananiadou, S., McNaught, J. (2004). Enhancing Automatic Term Recognition through Variation. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics COLING’04. Geneva, pp. 604 – 610.
  40. Picton, A. (2017). Diatopy, Diastratus and Diachrony: Inputs from a Dynamic Analysis of Term Variations in a Comparable Specialized Corpus. Interdisciplinary Knowledge-building: Challenges for LSP Research. Book of abstracts. 21st Conference on Language for Specific Purposes (28 – 30 June 2017). Bergen, R. 56.
  41. Temmerman, R. (2000). Towards New Ways of Terminology Description: The Sociocognitive Approach. Amsterdam – Philadelphia, 276 p.
  42. Wüster, E. (1979). Einführung in the terminology terminology and terminology Lexigography. Vienna – New York, 236 p.