• info@ukrmova.iul-nasu.org.ua
  • +38 (044)-278-12-09
  • Print ISSN 1682-3540
  • e-ISSN 2707-5249
» Journal Ukrainian Language – № 2 (90) 2024 » Journal Issues » 2020 » Journal Ukrainian Language – №3 (75) 2020 » THE ENDINGS OF ACCUSATIVE CASE OF NOUNS IN HISTORY OF UKRAINIAN ORTHOGRAPHY

THE ENDINGS OF ACCUSATIVE CASE OF NOUNS IN HISTORY OF UKRAINIAN ORTHOGRAPHY

Journal Ukrainian Language – №3 (75) 2020
UDC 81’366.544

Larysa Kolibaba,
PhD in Philology, Senior Research Scientist of the Department of Grammar and Scientific Terminology, Institute of the Ukrainian Language of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 4 Hrushevskyi St., Kyiv 01001, Ukraine

Е-mail: kolibaba.lm@meta.ua

Heading: Researches
Language: Ukrainian

Abstract:  The second form of accusative is the ancient original grammatical feature of the Ukrainian language, based on the tradition of folklore. It penetrated to the literary language from the living national language, so it was most consistently preserved verbal colloquial speech and language of fiction. Folk origin of the second form of accusative is reflected by the semantics of nouns used with the ending -a (-я) – these are primarily the names of сoncrete household objects. Instead, nouns – names of abstract concepts of masculine, that it is difficult to personify, in a folk language not so much. Because of this, the functioning of abstract nouns in the form of accusative with the ending -a (-я) is limited.

The main criterion that allows the second form of accusative case is semantic. It is based on the rules, presented in all editions of the academic «Ukrainian Spelling», but the register of nouns it was «let» to have this form was uneven, it was constantly narrowed, that predefined by socio-political conditions of functioning of the Ukrainian language at different time periods. Analysis of scientific and lexicographic sources from the beginning of the XX century and to this day it gives grounds to attribute the form of accusative case on -a (-я) to «repressed», artificially restricted in use. The difficult and regressive way of its normalization, besides lexicographic sources, is also attested by Ukrainian spellings of different years of publication.

The most complete list of nouns – the names of uncreatures of masculine of the second declension and the most fundamental rule for their endings in accusative of singular, based on a well-defined semantic criterion, is given in the «Ukrainian spelling» of 1928. Only in this edition for nouns – names of uncreatures of masculine of the second declension that is the names of concrete objects, as only correct and only the possible ending is -a (-я). Also in it, among the nouns of masculine of the second declension, in particular and the names of uncreatures, the prepositional constructs of the second accusative case are presented.

From the «Ukrainian Spelling» of 1933 to its most recent edition in 2019, the prescription for the use of accusative case with the ending -a (-я) has a form of a note (or rather – an exception) and fixes as normative two parallel morphological forms of accusative case of singular– on -a (-я) and with zero ending.

Researches of modern scientists, based on theoretical and lexicographic work 20–30th of ХХ of century and the language practice of the Ukrainian people from ancient times to the present, formed an objective basis for the revival of this multi-hundred-year tradition of the Ukrainian language in all functional and stylistic spheres of everyday life of the Ukrainian language, taking into account that text of note in relation to the second form of accusative, offered in the new release of the «Ukrainian Spelling» in 2019, it is needed to correct and extend, in particular to give more detailed list of lexico-semantic groups of nouns, for that the second form of accusative is an organic morphological feature, substantially to complement the register of nouns-illustrations, change placed the sequence of disposition of wordforms with a zero ending and ending -а (-я) and the note itself transformed into a rule.

Keywords: accusative case, the second form of accusative case, the second accusative, genitive case, nominative case, nouns – the names of uncreatures of masculine of the second declension, ending -а (-я), zero ending.

LEGEND

РУСКр – Krymskyi, A.Yu. (Еd.). (1924–1933). Russian-Ukrainian Dictionary: in 4 vol. Vol. 1–3. Kyiv (in Ukr.).
РУСПМ – Krymskyi, A.Yu. (Еd.). (1926). Russian-Ukrainian Dictionary of Legislative Language: (over 67 000 words). Kyiv: Drukarnia UAN (in Ukr.).
ФДМ – Pidmohylnyi, V., Pluzhnyk, Ye. (Eds.). (1927). Phraseology of Business Language. The second corrected edition. Kyiv: Chas (in Ukr.).
РУСВТ – Yakubski, S and O. (Eds.). (1928). Russian-Ukrainian Dictionary of military terminology. Kharkiv (in Ukr.).
СДМ – Doroshenko, M., Stanislavskyi, M., Strashkevych, V. (Eds.). (2018). Business Language Dictionary. Terminology and phraseology. Kyiv: Vydavnychyi Dim D. Burago. ХVI. 248 p. Reprint from the edition of 1930 (Series “Ukrainian Heritage Dictionary”) (in Ukr.).

REFERENCES

  1. Bezpalko, O.P. (1960). Essays of the historical syntax of the Ukrainian language. Kyiv: Radianska shkola (in Ukr.).
  2. URL: https://r2u.org.ua/vesum/ (Accessed 01.03.2020).
  3. Vykhovanets, I.R. (1987). System of cases of Kyiv: Naukona dumka (in Ukr.).
  4. Vykhovanets, I.R. (1989). Genitive or accusative case? Culture of the word, 37, 93–95 (in Ukr.).
  5. Vykhovanets, I.R. (1992). Essays of the functional syntax of the Ukrainian language. Кyiv: Naukova dumka (in Ukr.).
  6. Vykhovanets, I., Horodenska, K. (2004). Theoretical morphology of Ukrainian. Kyiv: Pulsary (in Ukr.).
  7. Vykhovanets, I.R. (2012). Speak on Ukrainian: linguistic etudes. Kyiv: Pulsary (in Ukr.).
  8. Vykhovanets, I.R., Horodenska, K.H., Zahnitko, A.P., Sokolova, S.O. (2017). Grammar of the modern Ukrainian literary language. Morphology. Kyiv: Vydavnychyi Dim D. Burago (in Ukr.).
  9. Ginzburh, M. (2012). About the forms of accusative in Ukrainian scientific texts. Ukrainian language, 4, 29–40 (in Ukr.).
  10. Ginzburh, M. (2013). The traditional Ukrainian accusative form as the means to ensure accuracy and clarity of professional texts. Stale and text, 14, 93–101 (in Ukr.).
  11. Horodenska, K. (2017). The grammatical norms of the Ukrainian literary language and the modern practice of the professional community. Dyvoslovo, 4, 40–45 (in Ukr.).
  12. Smal-Stotskyi, S., Hartner, F. (Eds.). (1914). Grammar of the Russian language. The third revised edition. Vienna (in Austria).
  13. Hrunskyi, N.K. (1918). Ukrainian grammar. Kyiv (in ).
  14. Hrunskyi, M., Myronenko, M. (1927). Ukrainian spelling (in Ukr.).
  15. History of the Ukrainian spelling: XVI–XX centuries. Reading-book (2004). Kyiv: Naukona dumka (in Ukr.).
  16. Ivanitsa, G. (1926). A course of Ukrainian in a summary practical narration. Gosudarstvennoe izdatelstvo Ukrainyi (in Ukr.).
  17. Kolibaba, L. (2013). The second form of accusative of nouns: semantiko-grammatical features and spheres of the functionally-stylistic usage. Materials of the 3rd International Scientific and Practical Internet-conference on Ukrainian Studies «Dialogue of Languages – Dialogue of Cultures. Ukraine and the World», November 1–4, 2012. München – Berlin – Washington D.C., 257–267 (in Germany).
  18. Kolibaba, L. (2014). The second form of accusative case of nouns as original feature of the Ukrainian language. Dyvoslovo, 6, 28–32 (in Ukr.).
  19. Kolibaba, L., Fursa, V. (2014). Dictionary of verbal government. Kyiv: Lybid (in Ukr.).
  20. Kostusiak, N.M. (2019). Actualizational forms of nouns and new lexemes in the modern Ukrainian language: aspects of investigation and problems of valuation. Grammar space of the modern Ukrainian studies: in honor of Kateryna Horodenska. P. 112–121. Kyiv: Vydavnychyi Dim D.Burago (in Ukr.).
  21. Kubaichuk, V. (2020). Chronology of language events in Ukraine: external history of the Ukrainian language of ІХ–ХХ Kyiv: «К. І. S.» (in Ukr.).
  22. Kurylo, O. (1925). Comments to the modern Ukrainian literary Edition 3. [Kharkiv]: Knyhospilka (in Ukr.).
  23. Matviienko, O. (1930). Nominative and genitive forms of accusative case. Zbirnyk derzhavnykh tsentralnykh kursiv ukrayinoznavstva, 3, 43–56. Kharkiv (in Ukr.).
  24. The main rules of the Ukrainian spelling. (1921). Кyiv: Derzhavne vydavnytstvo (in Ukr.).
  25. The main rules of the Ukrainian spelling. New edition. (1925). Кyiv: Chervonyi shliakh (in Ukr.).
  26. Ohiienko, I. (mytropolyt Ilarion). (2010). The mother tongue. Kyiv: Nasha kultura i nauka (in Ukr.).
  27. Ohiienko, I. (mytropolyt Ilarion). (2011). Our literary language. Kyiv: Nasha kultura i nauka (in Ukr.).
  28. Syniavskyi, O. (1922). Advisor of the Ukrainian language. Kharkiv – Berlin – New York: Ukraino-amerykanske vyd. t-vo «Kosmos» (in Germany).
  29. Syniavskyi, O. (2018). Norms of the Ukrainian literary language. XX. 368p. Reprint from the edition of 1931 (Series “The Ukrainian grammar classics”) (in Ukr.).
  30. Syniavskyi, O. (2004). A brief history of the «Ukrainian spelling». History of the Ukrainian spelling: XVI–XX centuries. Reading-book. 432–452. Kyiv: Naukona dumka (in Ukr.).
  31. Sulyma, M. (1928). Ukrainian phrase. Kharkiv (in Ukr.).
  32. Bilodid, I.K. (Ed.). (1969). The modern Ukrainian literary language: Morphology. Kyiv: Naukona dumka (in Ukr.).
  33. Hryshchenko, A.P. (Ed.). (1997). The modern Ukrainian literary language. Kyiv: Vyshcha shkola (in Ukr.).
  34. Taranenko, O.O. (Ed.). (2003). Inflexion of Ukrainian language. Nyíregyháza (in Hungary).
  35. Taranenko, O.O. (2005). Modern tendencies to the revision of normative principles of Ukrainian literary language and phenomenon of purism (within the limits of grammatical categories of noun). Linguistics, 3–4, 85–104 (in Ukr.).
  36. Tymchenko, Ye.K. (1913). Functions of genitive in the South Russian language area. Varshava: Varshavskij uchebnyj okrug (in Poland).
  37. Tymchenko, Ye.K. (1917). Ukrainian grammar. Kyiv: Vydavnytstvo Tovarystva «Chas» (in Ukr.).
  38. Ukrainian spelling (project). (1926). Kharkiv: Derzhavne vydavnytstvo Ukrainy (in Ukr.).
  39. Ukrainian spelling (project). (1928). Kharkiv: Derzhavne vydavnytstvo Ukrainy (in Ukr.).
  40. Ukrainian spelling. The first edition. (1929). Kharkiv: Derzhavne vydavnytstvo Ukrainy (in Ukr.).
  41. Ukrainian spelling. (1933). Kharkiv: Radianska shkola (in Ukr.).
  42. Ukrainian spelling (project of the fourth edition). (1938). Kyiv: Radianska shkola (in Ukr.).
  43. Ukrainian spelling. (1940). Kyiv (in Ukr.).
  44. Ukrainian spelling. (1946). Kyiv: Ukrainske derzhavne vydavnytstvo (in Ukr.).
  45. Ukrainian spelling. (1960). The second edition. Kyiv: Vyd-vo AN URSR (in Ukr.).
  46. Ukrainian spelling. (1990). The third edition. Kyiv: Naukona dumka (in Ukr.).
  47. Ukrainian spelling. (1993). The fourth edition. Kyiv: Naukona dumka (in Ukr.).
  48. Ukrainian spelling. Project of the newest edition. (1999). Kyiv: Naukona dumka (in Ukr.).
  49. Ukrainian spelling. Project. (2003). Kyiv (in Ukr.).
  50. Ukrainian spelling. (2019). Kyiv: Naukona dumka (in Ukr.).
  51. Chaplenko, V. (1970). History of the New Ukrainian Literary Language (XVII Century – 1933). New York (in USA).
  52. Yunosova, V.O. (2003). A variant of case endings of nouns is in modern literary Ukrainian. Kyiv: Znannia Ukrainy (in Ukr.).