Modern approach to studying the language situation: slavic experience and Ukrainian realities

Svitlana Sokolova, Doctor of Sciences in Philology, Professor, Chief in the Department of Stylistics, Culture of Language, and Sociolinguistics
Institute of the Ukrainian Language of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
4 Mykhaіlo Hrushevskyi St., Kyiv 01001, Ukraine

Е-mail: a-senchuk@ukr.net
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0052-6128

Heading: Articles
Language: Ukrainian

Abstract: The article analyzes the use of the phrase language situation (linguistic situation) in diffe rent national scientific traditions and approaches to describing the language situation in Slavic countries. It was found that, despite the similarity of the general definitions of this concept, in specific studies the attention is mainly focused on one of three possible aspects — the relationship between the functioning of various idioms within society, the situation with the use of a certain idiom in a certain territory or in a certain community or on the intra- language proper situation, that is, the internal differentiation of language to meet the va- rious needs of society. The choice of research direction is determined primarily by the con- figuration of the language situation itself, i.e., whether it is endo- or exogenous, whether the state language has an established literary tradition and traditions of stylistic differentia- tion, a powerful dialect base, how widespread it is outside the range of the main distribu- tion of the language, etc.

Ukrainian society is characterized as being in the process of transformation from an exogenous (characterized by mass bilingualism) to a predominantly endogenous (predomi- nance of the Ukrainian language) language situation. In this regard, there is a great need for research related to the analysis of language behavior of persons who are on the path of changing language preferences. Against the background of active migration processes pro- voked by the war, the problem of language adaptation of previously Russian-speaking citi- zens in a new language environment for them and the functioning of the Ukrainian lan- guage outside of Ukraine (as a diaspora and foreign language) becomes especially important. Given the limited possibility of making statistically reliable quantitative measurements of the language situation, the importance of studying individual language biographies of persons who have changed or are changing their language behavior is increasing.

Keywords: language situation, language behavior, language policy, Slavic countries, language functioning, language corpus planning, majority language, minority language, Ukrainian lan- guage abroad.

LEGEND
ВПО — internally displaced persons.
Закон, 2017 — Law of Ukraine “On Education”. (2017). Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada (ðð. 38—39). Official website of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Retrieved May 25, 2023 from http://surl.li/ylal (in Ukrainian).
Закон, 2019 — Law of Ukraine “On Supporting the Functioning of the Ukrainian Language as the State Language”. (2019). Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada ¹ 2704-VIII, April 25, 2019. Official website of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Retrieved May 25, 2023 from http://surl.li/rpyzr (in Ukrainian).
ЗМК — mass media.
КМІС — Kyiv International Institute of Sociology.

REFERENCES
Aleksova, K. (2014). The modern Bulgarian language situation in a European context. Diana Ivanova (Ed.), Language policy in a European and national context (рр. 65—81). Plovdiv: Paisii Hilendarski University Publishing House. Retrieved December 8, 2023 from (in Bulgarian).
Aleksova, K. (2016). The linguistic situation in Sofia against the background of the linguis tic situation in Bulgaria (based on data on ethnolinguistic diversity). Problems of sociolinguistics 12. The language situation — state and trends (рр. 254—271). Veliko Tarnovo: Sign “94”. Retrieved December 8, 2023 from http://surl.li/sgepj (in Bulgarian).
Berghe, van den, P.L. (2001). Power Differentials and Language. R. Mesthrie (Ed.), Con cise Encyclopedia of Sociolinguistics (рр. 597—603). Amsterdam — New York — Oxford — Shannon — Singapore — Tokyo: Elsevier.
Besters-Dilger, Yu. (Ed.). (2008). Language policy and language situation in Ukraine: Analysis and recommendations. Kyiv: Vydavnychyi dim “Kyievo-Mohylianska akademiia” (in Ukrainian).
Boiadzhyev, T. (2008а). The language situation in our country in historical and contemporary terms and the European language policy. Part 1. Bulgarian language, 2. Retrieved May 25, 2023 from http://surl.li/sgeqn (in Bulgarian).
Boiadzhyev, T. (2008b). The language situation in o ur country in historical and contemporary terms and the European language policy. Part 2. Bulgarian language, 3. Retrieved May 25, 2023 from http://surl.li/sgern (in Bulgarian).
Brown, D. (2001). Williams, Glyn (1939—). R. Mesthrie (Еd.), Concise Encyclopedia of So cio linguistics (рр. 924—925). Amsterdam — New York — Oxford — Shannon — Singapore — Tokyo: Elsevier.
Brytsyn, V.M. (2007a). Language policy. Ukrainian language: Encyclopedia (рр. 375—378). Kyiv: Vyd-vo “Ukr. entsykl.” im. M.P. Bazhana (in Ukrainian).
Brytsyn, V.M. (2007b). Language situation. Ukrainian language: Encyclopedia (р. 379). Kyiv: Vyd-vo “Ukr. entsykl.” im. M.P. Bazhana (in Ukrainian).
Chaplenko, V. (1974). Language policy of the Bolsheviks in Ukraine in the 1950s and 1960s. Chicago: Ukrainskyi Publitsystychno-Naukovyi Instytut (in Ukrainian).
Chemodanov, N.S. (Ed.). (1975). New in foreign linguistics. Vol. VII. Sociolinguistics. Moscow: Izdatelskij dom Progress (in Russian).
Dua, H.R. (2001). Language Development. R. Mesthrie (Ed.), Concise Encyclopedia of Sociolinguistics (pp. 630—633). Amsterdam — New York — Oxford — Shannon — Singapore — Tokyo: Elsevier.
Dzuba, I. (2005). Preface to the 1998 edition. Internationalism or Russification (pp. 32—41). Kyiv: Vydavnychyi dim “Kyievo-Mohylianska akademiia” (in Ukrainian).
Encyclopaedia Beliana (Zverejnené v novembri 2013). Retrieved May 25, 2023 from http://surl.li/syiui (in Slovak).
Ferguson, Ch.A. (1959). Diglossia. Word, 15(2), 325—340. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1959.11659702
Gajda, S., & Vidovich-Muha, A. (Eds.). (2003). Contemporary Polish and Slovenian lin guis tic situation. Opole: University of Opole, Institute of Polish Philology (in Polish).
Glushytsa, R. (2007). Standardization of the Montenegrin language. Ostojich Branislav (Ed.), Language situation in Montenegro — norm and standardization. International Scientific Conference, 24—25.05.2007 (pp. 259—266). Montenegrin Academy of Sciences and Arts. Retrieved May 25, 2023 from http://surl.li/sgetp (in Serbian).
Gogolin, I. (2001). The Linguistic Marketplace. R. Mesthrie (Ed.), Concise Encyclopedia of Sociolinguistics (pp. 612—613). Amsterdam — New York — Oxford — Shannon — Singapore — Tokyo: Elsevier.
Gren, Z. (2022). Relations between nationality and religion in a multi-ethnic and multi-religious community (on the example of Cieszyn Silesia). 6th International Scientific Confe- rence “Slavonic Languages in Sociolinguistic View” of the Sociolinguistics Com mittee affiliated to the International Committee of Slavists “Borderlands of the Slavonic region at the turn of 20th and 21st centuries. Language—Society—culture—identity”. Vilnius, September 8—10, 2022 (pp. 24—25). Retrieved December 08, 2023 from http://surl.li/sgeum
Henchel, G., & Kittel, B. (2011). Belarusian trilingualism? On the linguistic situation in Belarus on the basis of judgments by Belarusians about the spread of “their languages” in the country. Vienna Slavic Almanac, 67, 107—135 (in German).
Hudson, A. (2001). Diglossia. R. Mesthrie (Ed.), Concise Encyclopedia of Sociolinguistics (pp. 226—230). Amsterdam — New York — Oxford — Shannon — Singapore — Tokyo: Elsevier.
Kowalski, P. (2013). Slovenian in Hungary in the light of ecological typologies. The social functionality of language: aspects, criteria, definitions (pp. 219—225). Lublana (in Polish).
Krasowska, H. (2012). Polish minority in south-eastern Ukraine. Warszawa: Slavic Publishing Center (in Polish).
Kryszyn, T. (2012). Polish language in Belarus. Acta baltico-slavica, 36, 217—224 (in Polish).
Kulyk, V. (2023). Language and identity in Ukraine at the end of 2022. Zbruc. Retrieved September 18, 2023 from https://zbruc.eu/ node/114247 (in Ukrainian).
Le Page, R. (2001). DeCamp David (1927—79). R. Mesthrie (Ed.), Concise Encyclopedia of Sociolinguistics (p. 858). Amsterdam — New York — Oxford — Shannon — Singapore — Tokyo: Elsevier.
Lucas, C. (2001). Sociolinguistics of Sign Language. R. Mesthrie (Ed.), Concise Encyclo pedia of Sociolinguistics (pp. 89—92). Amsterdam — New York — Oxford — Shannon — Singapore — Tokyo: Elsevier.
Masenko, L.T. (2012). Soviet heritage in the language policy of Ukraine. Ecology of language and language policy in modern society (pp. 65—72). Kyiv: Vyd. dim Dmytra Buraho. Retrieved May 25, 2023 from http://surl.li/sgfaf (in Ukrainian).
Mechkovskaia, N.B. (2003). Belarusian language: Sociolinguistic essays. Munchen: Verlag Otto Sagner. Retrieved December 13, 2023 from http://surl.li/sgfcc (in Russian).
Mesthrie, R. (Ed.). (2001). Concise Encyclopedia of Sociolinguistics. Amsterdam — New York — Oxford — Shannon — Singapore — Tokyo: Elsevier.
Mikhalchenko, V.Iu. (Ed.). (2006). Dictionary of sociolinguistic terms. Moscow: Institut yazykoznaniia RAN (in Russian).
Mikhalchenko, V.Iu. (Ed.). (2016). Language and society. Encyclopedia. Moscow: Izdatelskyi tsentr “Azbukovnik” (in Russian).
Nekvapil, Ji. (2017). Language situation. Petr Karlik, Marek Nekula, Jana Pleskalova (Eds.), CzechEncy — New encyclopedic dictionary of the Czech language. Retrieved August 29, 2023 from http://surl.li/sgfcz (in Czech).
Neshchymenko, H.P. (2003). Language situation in Slavic countries. Description experience. Concept analysis. Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).
Ostojich, B. (Ed.). (2007). Language situation in Montenegro — norm and standardization. International Scientific Conference, 24—25.05.2007. Montenegrin Academy of Sciences and Arts. Retrieved May 25, 2023 from https://canupub.me/ivs0 (in Bosnian).
Pachev, A. (1993). A Little Encyclopedia of Sociolinguistics. Pleven: Eurasia-Abagar (in Bulgarian).
Pawlowski, À. (2019). The linguistic landscape of contemporary Poland: Polish, foreign languages, minority languages. Language guide, 8, 7—27 (in Polish).
Pylypchuk, O. (2013). From the history of the formation of sociolinguistic terminology: comparative characteristics of the respondents of U. Weinreich and Yu. Zhluktenko. Language and society, 4, 131—137 (in Ukrainian).
Selivanova, O. (2006). Modern linguistics: a terminological encyclopedia. Poltava — Kyiv: Dovkillia (in Ukrainian).
Shevelov, Yu. (2009). The Ukrainian language in the first half of the twentieth century (1900— 1941). Condition and status. Larysa Masenko (Ed.), Juri Shevelov. Selected works in two books (Book I. Linguistics, pp. 26—279). Kyiv: Vydavnychyi dim “Kyievo-Mohylianska akademiia” (in Ukrainian).
Shveitser, A.D., & Nykolskyi, L.B. (1978). Introduction to sociolinguistics. Moscow: Vyshcha shkola (in Russian).
Smal-Stotskyi, R. (1969). The Ukrainian language in Soviet Ukraine. New York — Toronto — Sydney — Paris: Naukove tovarystvo im. Shevchenka v ZDA (in Ukrainian).
Sokolova, S.O. (2023). (Ed.). Territorial and sociocultural conditions of functioning of the Ukrainian language in Ukraine: monograph [authors: S.O. Sokolova, M.O. Hontar, O.M. Danylevska, H.M. Zalizniak, L.T. Masenko, O.H. Ruda, V.M. Trub, I.M. Tsar]. Kyiv. Retrieved May 25, 2023 from http://surl.li/parnp (in Ukrainian).
Sotirovich, V.B. (2013). The sociolinguistic aspect of the breakup of Yugoslavia and the Ser- bian national question. Third revised edition. Vilnius. Retrieved May 25, 2023 from http://surl.li/sgfip (in Serbian).
Stojanovich, Je. (2007). The identity and status of the Serbian language in Montenegro (then and now). Ostojich Branislav (Ed.), Language situation in Montenegro — norm and standardization. International Scientific Conference, 24—25.05.2007 (pp. 267—283). Montenegrin Academy of Sciences and Arts. Retrieved May 25, 2023 from https://canupub.me/ivs0 (in Serbian).
Toshovich, B., & Wonisch, A. (Ed.). (2010). Serbian views on the relations between the Serbian, Croatian and Bosniak languages. Institute for Slavic Studies at the Karl Franzens University in Graz. The Belgrade book (in Bosnian).
Vasylieva, L.P. (2016). Sociolinguistics in South Slavic countries. Movoznavstvo, 6, 37—47. Retrieved May 25, 2023 from http://surl.li/ sgfjw (in Ukrainian).
Wingender, M. (2017). The Volga-Ural region in the light of definition, classification and typology of language situations. Multilingualism in the Volga-Ural region, 1, 9—26 (in Russian).
Zhluktenko, Yu.O. (1964). Ukrainian-English interlanguage relations. Ukrainian language in the USA and Canada. Kyiv: Vydavnytstvo Kyivskoho universytetu (in Ukrainian).
Zhluktenko, Yu.O. (1990). Ukrainian language on the linguistic map of Canada. Kyiv: Naukova dumka (in Ukrainian).
Zielinska, A. (2002). Polish minority in Kaunas Lithuania: A sociolinguistic study. Warszawa: Slavic publishing center (in Polish).