• info@ukrmova.iul-nasu.org.ua
  • +38 (044)-278-12-09
  • Print ISSN 1682-3540
  • e-ISSN 2707-5249
» Journal Issues » 2021 » Journal Ukrainian Language – № 3 (79) 2021 » Language aggression in the information space: Between style norm and destruction

Language aggression in the information space: Between style norm and destruction

Journal Ukrainian Language – № 3 (79) 2021
UDC 811.161.2’38
Tetiana Kotsʹ, Doctor of Sciences in Philology, Senior Researcher in the Department of Stylistics, Language Culture, and Sociolinguistics, Institute of the Ukrainian Language of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
4 Hrushevsʹkyi St., Kyiv 01001, Ukraine

Е-mail: tetyana_kots@ukr.net
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4622-9559

Heading: Articles
Language: Ukrainian

Abstract: This article investigates theoretical issues as well as functional and stylistic manifestations of language aggression in the information space. A genus-species connection is established between the terms ‘evaluation’ and ‘language aggression’. The term ‘evaluation’ refers to the critical analysis of socio-political, economic, and cultural processes and indicates the dynamics of stylistic norms and language aggression which affects genre and style of mass media, aesthetic criterion of standard language norms, and a universal and national values scale.

The author analyzes a philosophical and evaluative paradigm of the means of negative axiology to denote the concepts of ‘state,’ ‘power’, and ‘war’ relevant to the conditions of today’s Ukraine. The article concentrates, in particular, on the dynamics of the language aggression expression in the 20th — early 21st century, namely on expanding the role of genre in using the language aggression in which a status of communication participants is shifted to a journalist and its reader. In this sense, the modality of the mass media’s duty is addressed to the processes and phenomena within the state, in particular to the authorities and external challenges of the Russian-Ukrainian war. A special emphasis is placed on the implementation in the mass media of the current functional and stylistic potential of language to express the socio-political and philosophical confrontation of hostile parties in the context of the division of values into their own and others. The paper examines vocabulary, phraseology, metaphors, epithets, means of expressive syntax, the phenomenon of desymantization of terminology, and formation of new synonymous series, which are indicative in modern texts and express linguosophy of universal and national social consciousness.

Keywords:
language aggression, evaluation, negative evaluative language means, semantics, semantic and stylistic function, synonyms.

REFERENCES
1. Bohdan, S.K. (2004). Movna povedinka ukraїnsʹkykh telezhurnalistiv: Ahresiia chy to le rantnistʹ. Naukovi Zapysky NaUKMA. Filolohichni Nauky, 34, 31—38 (in Ukrainian).
2. Huz, O.P. (2010). Osoblyvosti vyrazhennia verbalʹnoї ahresiї u masmediinomu dyskursi. Naukovi Zapysky Natsionalʹnoho Universytetu “Ostrozʹka Akademiia.” Seriia “Filolohichna,” 13, 154—159 (in Ukrainian).
3. Hlukhovtseva, K. (2015). Vas pereїkhaty chy vy mene propustyte (Movna i sotsiokulʹturna ah resiia v misʹkomu prostori Luhanshchyny). Kulʹtura Slova, 83, 85—89 (in Ukrainian).
4. Zavalʹniuk, I.Ia. (2009). Syntaksychni odynytsi v movi ukraїnskoї presy pochatku ХХI st.: Funktsionalʹnyi i prahmalinhvistychnyi aspekty. Vinnytsia (in Ukrainian).
5. Kachmar, O.V. (2014). Ahresiia iak sotsialʹnyi fenomen. Nova Paradyhma, 125, 19—205 (in Ukrainian).
6. Lazutkina, E.M. (2008). Publitsisticheskii stilʹ: Novye cherty. Moscow: OOO Izdatelʹstvo “ELPIS” (іn Russian).
7. Masenko, L.T. (2017). Mova radiansʹkoho totalitaryzmu. Kyiv: Klio (in Ukrainian).
8. Parakhonsʹkyi, B., Iavorsʹka, H. (2019). Ontolohiia viiny i myru: Bezpeka, stratehiia, smysl. Kyiv: NISS (in Ukrainian).
9. Ratsiburskaia, L.V. (2015). Izuchenie iazykovoi spetsifiki mediinykh tekstov pri podgotovke fi lologov i zhurnalistov. Rossiiskii Gumanitarnyi Zhurnal, 4(2), 160—164 (іn Russian).
10. Russo, Zhan-Zhak. (2001). Pro suspilʹnu uhodu, abo pryntsypy politychnoho prava (O. Khoma, Trans.). Kyiv: Port-Royal (in Ukrainian).
11. Smaznova, I.S. (2019). Ahresiia i tolerantnistʹ: Filosofsʹko-Pravovyi dyskurs. Odesa: Feniks (in Ukrainian).
12. Stepanenko, M. (2018). Publitsystychno-Politychni peryfrazy v ukraїnsʹkii movi. Poltava: Dyvosvit (in Ukrainian).
13. Fuko, M. (1996). Arkheologiia znaniia (S. Mitin, D. Stasov, Trans.). Kyiv: Nika-Tsentr (in Russian).
14. Khudolii, A.O. (2004). Dynamika funktsionalʹnykh zmin u movi amerykansʹkoї publitsystyky kintsia ХХ — pochatku ХХI st. [Dissertation summary for the Candidate of Philological Sciences degree, Kyiv National Linguistic University]. Kyiv (in Ukrainian).
15. Cvetanovich, I., Radovich, V. (2017). Language and style in the time of global mass media. Home, 4(12), 3—7 (in English).