LINGUISTIC PROFILE OF SOURCE AS A TERMINOGRAPHICAL TOOL

Iryna Kazymyrova, PhD in Philology, Senior Researcher of the Department of Grammar and Scientific Terminology, Institute of the Ukrainian Language of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
4 Hrushevskyi St., Kyiv 01001, Ukraine

Е-mail: kazymyrovai@gmail.com
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6309-0363

Heading: Researches
Language: Ukrainian

Abstract: The article characterizes the sources of the historical dictionary of linguistic terms. The source base for the study of the evolution of Ukrainian linguistic terminology includes secondary sources, divided into such groups: 1) grammars and textbooks; 2) dictionaries and encyclopedias; 3) monographs and scientific articles on linguistic issues.

The concept of “linguistic profile of the source” is used to describe the linguistic source of the historical dictionary of linguistic terms. The conceptualization process as a cognitive mechanism of the meaning formation is based on speech operations that a person uses in language usage. Determinant in the perception of information is the phenomenon of attention, which has several designations in cognitive linguistics: highlighting, perspectivization, profiling, focusing. The linguistic conceptualization of the cognitive profiling operation is based on the thesis that a person has the cognitive ability to perceive, interpret and describe the same reference situation differently, using different linguistic means. It is because a person chooses the most important and significant information for him at this moment from all other. Terms figure and background are used to describe the perceptual connection between the object of focus and the rest of the perceptual field. The links between terms figure and background at first were described by the Danish Gestalt psychologist E. Rubin.

The concept of a linguistic profile of source is used to focus the researches attention on those aspects of the analyzed sources that are important for studying the evolution of the linguistic term. The following key points are I. “External” criticism of the source. 1. Time of the source creation. 2. Place of the source creation. 3. The historical and cultural and linguistic situation in the region of the source creation. 4. The author of the source, its age, education, worldview, etc. 5. Motives and circumstances of the source creation. 6. Estimation of the source in linguistic works. 7. Works that are the basis of the analyzed source. ІІ. “Internal” source criticism. 1. Complete coverage of language tiers. 2. The terms that denote the linguistic concepts, their hierarchical organization. 3. The author’s orientation on the specific Ukrainian / borrowed vocabulary to describe linguistic concepts. 4. Features of the usage of lexical units to denote the linguistic concepts in the source text, their paradigmatics and syntagmatics. This article is modelled the linguistic profile of I.H. Verkhratskyi’s works.

The analysis of linguistic sources by these parameters makes it possible to present the history of a linguistic term in a linguistic text, taking into account its contextual environment and the richness of syntagmatic and paradigmatic connections. The linguistic profile of the source/works is an actual basis of dictionary articles of historical dictionaries of linguistic terms of different genres.

Keywords: linguistic term, historical dictionary of linguistic terms, linguistic source studies, profiling, linguistic profile of a source, language personality.

 

REFERENCES

1. Baimut, T.V. (2014). Historical dictionary of Ukrainian grammatical terminology (author’s abstract of the thesis). Selected scientific works. Nizhyn (in Ukr.).
2. Verkhratskyi, I. (1902). About Dialect of the Galician Lemkas. Lviv (in Ukr.).
3. Verkhratskyi, I. (1913). Impossible purisms. URL: https://zbruc.eu/node/13516 (in Ukr.).
4. Verkhratskyi, I. (1873). Regarding the national language. Pravda, 16 (28) August. Lviv. Р. 495–499. (in Ukr.).
5. Verkhratskyi, I. (1899). Znadoby do piznannia uhorsko-ruskykh hovoriv. Slovarets. iz Zapysok NTSH. Vol. 27–30 (in Ukr.).
6. Verkhratskyi,I. (1876). Odvit O. Partytskomu na eho zamitku, vimirenu protyv staty: “Kilka sliv o slovari O. Partytskoho”. Lviv (in Ukr.).
7. Verkhratskyi, I. (1877). Requirements for the Southern-Russian Dictionary. Lviv (in Ukr.).
8. Verkhratskyi, I. (1907). Malicious inventions of D Ivan Franko. Lviv (in Ukr.).
9. Verkhratskyi, I. (1913). Our Lviv (in Ukr.).
10. Verkhratskyi, I. (1875). Some words about Partytskyi’s dictionary. Lviv (in Ukr.).
11. Verkhratskyi, I. Note on the of Partytskyi’s answer. URL: https://zbruc.eu/node/94521 (in Ukr.).
12. Verkhratskyi, I. (1912). Hovir batiukiv.. Zbirnyk filolohichnoi sektsii NTSh. 15. Lviv (in Ukr.).
13. Horda, O.M. (2016). Establishment and evolution of word formation terminology in Halychyna school grammar books of the Ukrainian language (the second half of the 19th – the first half of the 20th century): … cand. philol. sciences: 10.02.01. 353 р. Lviv (in Ukr.).
14. Zakharchyn, V.V. (1995). Ukrainian linguistic terminology at the end of the 19^th – the beginning of the 20^th century: author’s abstract of the thesis of the Candidate of Philological sciences: 10.02.01. 26 Kyiv (in Ukr.).
15. Katsimon, O.A. (2010). Theoretical and practical aspects of the activity of Ukrainian linguists in Bukovyna at the end of the XIX-th – beginning of the XX-th centuries: author’s abstract of the thesis of the Candidate of Philological sciences: 10.02.01. 20 Chernivtsi (in Ukr.).
16. Kozelko, I.R. (2019). Linguistic terminology of V. Simovych in the context of grammars of the end of the ХІХ – first half of the ХХ century: diss. … cand. philol. sciences: 10.02.01. 277 р. Lviv (in Ukr.).
17. Lesiuk, M. (2014). Formation and development of the Ukrainian literary language in Galicia. Ivano-Frankivsk (in Ukr.).
18. Losun (1892). Language notes. Zoria, 24, 472–474. Lviv (in Ukr.). URL: https://zbruc.eu/node/57539.
19. Mamchych, I.P. (2002). Vasyl Chaplenko’s Linguistic Heritage: author’s abstract of the thesis of the Candidate of Philological sciences: 10.02.01. 22 р. Dnipropetrovsk (in Ukr.).
20. Medved, O.V. (2001). Ukrainian grammatical terminology system (history and current state): author’s abstract of the thesis of the Candidate of Philological sciences: 10.02.01. 17 р. Kharkiv (in Ukr.).
21. Mykytiuk, V.I. (1995). Literary and scientific heritage of Omelian Ohonovskyi: author’s abstract of the thesis of the Candidate of Philological sciences: 10.02.01. 19 р. Lviv (in Ukr.).
22. Mykytiuk, O. (2004). Ivan Verkhratskyi as a Visnyk of the Lviv University. Series Philology, 34, Vol. II, 137 – 141 (in Ukr.).
23. Moskalenko, N.A. (1955). From the history of the Ukrainian grammatical terminology. Kyiv (in Ukr.).
24. Moskalenko, N.A. (1959). Essay on the history of the Ukrainian grammatical terminology. Kyiv (in Ukr.).
25. Moskalenko, N.A. (1959). Essay on the history of the Ukrainian punctuation terminology. Kyiv (in Ukr.).
26. Moskalenko, A.A. (1961). Essay on the history of the Ukrainian dialectology. Vol. 1. Odesa (in Ukr.).
27. Ohiienko, I.I. (1908). Historical dictionary of Ukrainian grammatical terminology with a preface about the history of it. Kyiv (in Ukr.).
28. Review of the life and work of Ivan Verkhratskyi (1895). Zoria, 2, 37–38 (in Ukr.).
29. Serova, I.G. (2007). Cognitive mechanisms of sense formation in the sphere of gender Issues of Cognitive Linguistics, 4 (013), 92–97 (in Rus.).
30. Franko, I. (1984). Historical Essay about Ukranian-Ruthenian Literature till 1890. Collected works: in 50 vol.41. Рр. 194–470. Lviv (in Ukr.).
31. Franko, I. (1981). Our literary life in 1892. Collected works: in 50 vol.29. Рр. 7–22. Lviv (in Ukr.).
32. Khudash, M.L. (1971). I.H. Verkhratskyi (to the 125^th anniversary of his birth). Linguistics, 4, 63–68 (in Ukr.).
33. Chernobrov, Yu.A. (2017). Formation of syntactic terminology in Ukrainian linguistics in XIX – I part of XX century: author’s abstract of the thesis of the Candidate of Philological sciences: 10.02.01. 303 р. Kyiv (in Ukr.).
34. Chernobrov, Yu.A. (2019). History of Ukrainian syntactic terms: XIX – I part of XX century. Kyiv (in Ukr.).
35. Shevelov, Yu. (2002). Portraits of Ukrainian linguists. Kyiv (in Ukr.).
36. Yakymovych-Chapran, D.B. (2009). The lexis (lexicon) for designation of notions from science of linguistics in the relicts of Ukrainian language of XVI – XVII с.: author’s abstract of the thesis of the Candidate of Philological sciences: 10.02.01. 20 р. Lviv (in Ukr.).
37. Yaroshevych, I.A. (2008). Ukrainian morphological terminology (the 20^th century – the beginning of the 21^th century): author’s abstract of the thesis of the Candidate of Philological sciences: 10.02.01. 20 р. Kyiv (in Ukr.).